The Dolpins Archive

Plagiarized Articles on the All over the world information superhighway Encylopedia of Philosophy? (up to date)

Mark Thakkar (St. Andrews) suggests he has realized plagiarism in just about 40 posts within the International-wide-web Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

In a thread posted on Twitter very closing night time, Dr. Thakkar wrote:

There are ≥40 plagiarized content material within the On-line Encylopedia of Philosophy (@iephilosophy). I do know this many because of an opportunity discovery through @InnocentOP, who noticed that the Augustine access used to be lifted from the New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Spiritual Knowledge (1908–12).

Ditto English Deism, French Deism, Denis Diderot, Emanation, Encyclopedists, Immanuel Hermann Fichte, William Hamilton, Karl Robert Eduard Von Hartmann, Claude Adrien Helvetius, Renaissance Humanism, Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, Peter Lombard, William Paley, William Warburton.

A sixteenth access lifted from the New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Spiritual Working out (1908–12) used to be modified through a in reality first posting in 2017, however the plagiarized version is proceed to in the market at the IEP web site:

10 entries will also be traced to Harper’s Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (1896), once in a while with supplementary content material from but every other supply: Damon, Democritus, Demonax, Diogenes Laertius, Hippias, Menippus, Roman Philosophy, Symposium, Theophrastus, Timon.

4 entries are plagiarized from Sorley’s A Historical past of British Philosophy to 1900 (1920): Edward Herbert of Cherbury, Thomas Henry Huxley, Shadworth Hodgson, Leslie Stephen. The former of those additionally will take fabrics from the Dictionary of Countrywide Biography (1912).

The opposite 10 are from sources corresponding to Stanley Baldwin’s Dictionary of Philosophy & Psychology (1902) and Burnet’s Greek Philosophy: Thales to Plato (1914): Euclides, Leucippus, Peripatetics, Prodicus, Pyrrho, Pythagoras, Stilpo, James Hutchison Stirling, Synderesis, Voluntarism.

The Web Encyclopedia of Philosophy claims to be peer-reviewed, however a few of its articles have skilled handiest beauty permutations for the reason that the 18th century (an individual repeat supply getting William Enfield’s Historical past of Philosophy, a 1791 translation of Brucker’s 1767 Historia Critica).

I used to be succesful to discover those plagiarized entries as a result of they’ve been all labelled with “The writer of this write-up is anonymous. The IEP is actively looking to get an author who will write a selection put up.” I in reality a lot hope this means the sooner discussed record is exhaustive.

No query Prof. James Fieser, the founding father of the IEP (@iephilosophy), will have the ability to identify the plagiarist(s) responsible. I’m additionally tagging Michael Dougherty (@MVDougherty123), who merits to be a lot better considered a tireless opponent of plagiarism in instructional philosophy.

I’ve an inquiry out to the editors of the IEP asking about this, and I’ll replace this write-up after they answer. In the intervening time, have you ever seem throughout different articles within the IEP that appear to be plagiarized? Tell us.

See also  Global-wide-web Slams 'Ungrateful' Feminine Complaining About Boyfriend's Homemade Birthday Cake

(through the use of Catarina Dutilh Novaes)

UPDATE (2/10/22):  James Fieser (College of Tennessee at Martin), founder and editor of the All over the world information superhighway Encyclopedia of Philosophy, sent the next response:

I welcome this strategy to reaction questions in regards to the IEP’s “proto articles”. Our helpful useful resource arrived online in 1995, and, for a lot of that point, the IEP “About” webpage contained the next statement:

“Lots of the posts in The IEP are number one contributions through specialized philosophers those are identifiable through the writer’s name on the foot of the object. Other people are short-term, or “proto posts,” and feature most commonly been tailored from older resources. They’re identifiable through the inclusion of the initials “IEP” on the close to and can in time get replaced through distinctive content material.” (world wide site/20120502084107/

These kind of extra mature sources had been revealed reference works within the public area. In 2012, at some stage in the usual machine of updating our website online, this statement used to be taken out. Having mentioned that, the existing IEP “Submissions” web site web page even now is composed of the next connection with the proto posts:

“Authors would possibly in all probability additionally give to exchange any IEP proto-posts, that are identifiable through the inclusion of the initials “IEP” as a substitute than an individual’s title on the foot of the posting.” ( up)

When those proto content material articles have ably served the philosophical group above the years, we’re applying this instance to bid farewell to the rest varieties.